Sisters of Mute | Openmute - Linkme2 - More is More - independent media distribution
sitemap help
Submit Content

You can post articles, news and much more to this site.

Submit Content here

This is What Recuperation Looks Like: the Rebellion in Oaxaca and the APPO OpenPublishing | News & Analysis
Submitted by Ben on Wednesday, 29 November, 2006 - 23:12

Kellen Kass

Useful background on Oaxaca.
B

 This is What Recuperation Looks Like: the Rebellion in
 Oaxaca and the APPO
 By Kellen Kass
 (from the forthcoming A Murder of Crows #2)

 On May 22, 2006, teachers in the state of Oaxaca,
 Section 22 of the National Education Worker's Union
 (SNTE), went on strike. Section 22 has yearly strikes
 in Oaxaca to demand a variety of concessions from the
 state, and this year's strike included calls for
 higher wages, the construction of more schools
 throughout the state of Oaxaca, as well as free
 lunches and supplies for students. Section 22 members
 occupied the city center, the Zócalo, to further their
 protest and disrupt the state capital during the
 beginning of the tourist season. They set up camping
 sites in the main square, occupied public buildings
 and organized large marches, or mega-marches as the
 Oaxacans call them, to reinforce their economic
 demands as well as calling for the resignation of
 Governor Ulises Ruiz. Public support was quite strong
 for the marches as well as the occupation.

 In early June, teachers were given a final offer and
 ultimatum to vacate the Zócalo. On June 14, a police
 raid authorized by Gov. Ruiz involving nearly 3,000
 officers from the state police attacked the central
 square in the early morning hours. A helicopter
 dropped tear gas into the square to disorient the
 occupiers, while outside of the city riot police
 readied themselves for an invasion. Police attacked
 the main square, completely destroying the teachers'
 encampments and injuring hundreds. Teachers and Oaxaca
 residents fought back against police aggression and
 were able to retake the square in a matter of hours
 with their fists and makeshift weapons. During the
 fighting, however, 8 people died and others were
 "disappeared. "

 After people reoccupied the Zócalo and took control of
 surrounding blocks, a mega-march was held on June 16,
 with an estimated 400,000 people taking part. This
 time however, the teachers dropped their economic
 demands in exchange for one political demand: the
 removal of Gov. Ruiz. Despite the narrowed focus, the
 struggle was extended in a variety of ways; teachers
 occupied seven city hall buildings across the state,
 and students at the Benito Juarez Autonomous
 University of Oaxaca (UABJO) took over their school
 radio station in support of the striking teachers. In
 addition to these actions, teachers and many on the
 left formed the Popular Assembly of the People of
 Oaxaca (APPO). The APPO was an ad hoc organization for
 people to come together to talk about the events
 transpiring and to plan future action.

 July was contentious as well because the Mexican
 presidential elections took place at the beginning of
 the month. Much like Ruiz's election, the presidential
 election was fraught with allegations of fraud.
 Throughout the recount, groups in Oaxaca managed to
 not be drawn into any particular party's machinations.

 On August 1, a women's march involving some 2,000
 people made its way through Oaxaca to the city center.
 From there a few hundred women took their protest out
 of the street and into the building of TV Channel 9.
 They occupied the building and took over the station,
 broadcasting themselves and their views on the current
 situation; video footage of the various marches and
 police raids was also shown. By August 22, Ruiz and
 his cohorts had had enough, and they launched a
 paramilitary attack against the station. In response,
 people took to the streets, overturning several city
 buses, setting them on fire, and using them to block
 major roads. In addition, demonstrators took over
 private radio stations to spread news of the raid and
 to announce solidarity messages. At the same time
 various smaller groups armed with clubs shut down
 intersections across the already paralyzed city.

 Paramilitary violence has been a serious problem
 throughout the teachers' strike and occupation of the
 city. The term paramilitaries is awfully vague, and it
 has been extremely difficult to find out who has been
 behind some of the shootings; those captured are
 seldom identified by the state. Certainly the
 paramilitaries involve Mexican military, Oaxacan
 police, as well as the private army of Ruiz who is, at
 the time of this writing, still desperately clinging
 to power. At a march on August 10, gunmen opened fire
 killing one teacher, Jose Jimenez. On October 18, a
 teacher and APPO participant, Pánfilo Hernández, was
 shot and killed in a paramilitary drive-by. On October
 27, Brad Will, anarchist and Indymedia journalist, was
 shot and killed by paramilitaries, as were Emilio
 Alonso Fabián and Esteban López Zurita. These are some
 of the most well documented cases, but there are
 dozens of others who have died in this fight as well.

 Events in October were tumultuous, and the month came
 to a crashing conclusion. On October 26, Section 22
 teachers voted to end their strike amidst allegations
 of voting fraud and accusations that their leadership
 had sold out. And on October 28, Vicente Fox announced
 that he was ordering thousands of Federal Preventative
 Police (PFP) into Oaxaca in order to retake the city.
 When the PFP invasion came, the APPO urged peaceful
 protest and non-violent resistance to the police.
 Lines of riot police equipped with tear gas and batons
 pushed back thousands of people, and they also used
 armored trucks with water cannons and plows to
 disperse people and destroy barricades. The APPO sent
 out numerous communiqués exhorting people to act
 peacefully, and even went so far as to denounce all
 violent actions against the PFP as the work of agent
 provocateurs. People laid down in the roads, pushed
 against police lines, but by nightfall the PFP had
 made it's way into the city center.

 As police pushed further into the city on November 2,
 they attempted to retake the university and destroy
 the occupied radio station within it. In a six-hour
 battle with police, students and many other people
 used molotov cocktails, rocks, steel pipes and slings
 to fight police, and they overturned cars and buses to
 further reinforce their blockades. This fierce
 resistance forced the police to withdraw, and put a
 stop to police advances into the university area.
 Students and many others were clearly upset about the
 loss of the Zócalo to state forces. Therefore they
 decided to use violent means to continue occupying the
 university regardless of what the APPO said. At the
 time of this writing, the students and the APPO still
 control the area surrounding the university.

 Roots of Rebellion

 "The rich will do anything for the poor but get off
 their backs." – Karl Marx

 The uprising in Oaxaca and the popular mobilizations
 have made international headlines recently, but the
 causes of the situation have not garnered as much
 attention. In August 2004, Ulises Ruiz Ortiz, a
 lawyer, "won" the Oaxaca governor's election by a slim
 margin. Ruiz's opponents immediately contested the
 election results, charging that he and his cohorts had
 rigged the outcome. Apparently the opposition's claims
 were not unfounded, but Ruiz still took office in
 December later that year. Ruiz is a member of the
 Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) that
 completely controlled the Mexican federal government
 for over 70 years until the 2000 election of Vicente
 Fox, a National Action Party (PAN) member, to the
 presidency.

 Considering the extreme poverty in Mexico, with some
 40 million living well below the poverty line, it is
 not surprising that one of the main ways that the PRI
 remained in power was through a system of patronage:
 contracts, jobs, and funding for education and basic
 services are handed out after successful elections of
 PRI officials on the local and national level. In
 thousands of other cases, and specifically in Ruiz's
 case, bags of groceries were handed out in exchange
 for votes. In Oaxaca though, it was not just Ruiz who
 came to power in this way. In the first few months of
 2006 there were also conflicts over town elections in
 San Blas Atempa, Oaxaca between the Party of the
 Democratic Revolution (PRD) candidate and a PRI
 candidate over issues of voter fraud and purchasing of
 votes. While this may seem outrageous, patronage has
 been a normal procedure in politics worldwide for
 centuries, and the PRI is just a standard political
 machine that many throughout Mexico are
 finally fed up with. Unfortunately, many people think
 that these corrupt politicians should simply be
 replaced by honest politicians.

 The roots of the problem, however, go much deeper than
 PRI patronage and corruption that permeate Mexican
 politics. The cause of the mobilization and violent
 clashes with police lies in the absolutely wretched
 economic conditions that dominate life across southern
 Mexico. Oaxaca, bordering Chiapas to the west, is
 Mexico's second-poorest state and has the
 second-largest population of indigenous peoples.
 According to human rights organizations, nearly 80% of
 Oaxaca lives in extreme poverty. The main industry
 that props up the economy of Oaxaca is tourism. And
 like all tourist areas, most people work in services
 where wages are low, and many public services are
 geared towards visitors as opposed to actual
 residents.

 International trade agreements such as the North
 American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) have only made
 things worse. The implementation of neo-liberal
 reforms to the Mexican state, which has meant an
 overall cuts to basic necessities over the past
 several years, has made it even more difficult for
 people to survive. In recent years, Mexico has been
 unable to keep pace with China's offer to the altar of
 economic sacrifice: its immense, expendable and
 therefore cheap work force. Thus Mexico has been
 subject to the migration of factories and jobs to Asia
 in the same way that the United States has experienced
 "job loss" to Mexico. Thus it is not hard to see that
 dictates of the market care little about countries,
 and that capital flows in the direction of greater
 profit and greater misery.

 It is this complex situation that has led to decades
 of social conflict and has culminated in the struggle
 we see now.

 We're All on the Same Team: the APPO

 "Our aim is a more democratic government that listens
 to the people more than the current government does."
 –APPO Spokesman Florentino Lopez Martinez

 While many inspiring actions are taking place in
 Oaxaca, one must not lose the ability to look
 critically at situations. On the surface the APPO
 appears to be simply an assembly of common people
 charting out their future, but there are very distinct
 political perspectives and groups involved. The
 membership of the APPO is extremely varied and is
 composed of a variety of social organizations,
 political groupings, unions, and human rights
 organizations. Members of Section 22 are involved, as
 are anarchists, municipal authorities, and indigenous
 organizations such as the Movimiento de Unificación y
 Lucha Triqui (MULT) and the Popular Indigenous Council
 of Oaxaca – Ricardo Flores Magon (CIPO-RFM). Within
 the APPO, representatives from each group participate
 in meetings where issues are decided based on
 consensus as opposed to majority rule. Members are not
 supposed to be involved in parties participating in
 electoral politics, but membership is open to groups
 such as the
 Revolutionary Popular Front (FPR) and the Union of
 Revolutionary Youth of Mexico (UJRM), both of which
 are openly appendages of the Marxist-Leninist Mexican
 Communist Party. One of the spokesmen for the APPO,
 Florentino Lopez Martinez, has stated in interviews
 that he is a member of the FPR.

 Aside from small aspiring states such as the
 Marxist-Leninist Mexican Communist Party, there are
 other politicians in the midst of the APPO. One of the
 spokespeople of the APPO, the media-darling and crass
 opportunist Flavio Sosa, was a part of Vicente Fox's
 election campaign in 2000 through his organization the
 New Left of Oaxaca. Sosa has also been actively
 involved in the PRI splinter-party the Party of the
 Democratic Revolution (PRD) for years, a party he
 actually quit in order to be involved in the APPO. It
 should be pretty obvious that Sosa is a political
 opportunist who moves from one group to the next in
 hopes of carving out some kind of position for
 himself. He's a classic recuperator, and one in
 serious need of an ass kicking.

 It is also interesting to note that APPO member and
 Section 22 leader, Enrique Rueda Pacheco, gave a
 speech at the fifth mega-march in Oaxaca in early
 September calling for "national unity" and a movement
 that would incorporate the PRD and the Zapatistas. He
 has also been involved in trying to end the teachers'
 strike as far back as July. Like a typical union hack,
 he consistently tried to undermine the strike in
 exchange for political clout. Clearly, the APPO is a
 mixed bag and includes its fair share of aspiring
 politicians and real politicians. This, however, is
 not the most damning aspect.

 At the end of September, three days of meetings were
 held to discuss the transformation of the APPO from an
 ad hoc organization to a more formalized and permanent
 organization in Oaxaca. Following the meetings, a
 document entitled "Resolutions of the First State
 Assembly of the Peoples of Oaxaca" was released. This
 document is perhaps the best indication of the nature
 of the APPO because it is an attempt to define
 "…Statutes, the Declaration of Principles, a
 definitive Structure and a Program of Struggle."
 Within the resolutions there is a section entitled
 "Proposal for a Program of Struggle," which is most
 revealing of the overall aims of the APPO.

 The first point of the program of struggle is entitled
 "For the Defense of National Sovereignty, " in which
 they outline their proposal for withdrawing the
 Mexican state from trade agreements such as NAFTA and
 the FTAA, as well as from organizations such as the
 IMF and World Bank. Their second point, entitled "For
 a New Model of Economic Development" reaffirms
 national ownership of natural resources and calls for
 the re-nationalization of industries that have been
 privatized, as well as the nationalization of
 monopolistic industries such as banking. Thus the APPO
 identifies neo-liberal institutions like the IMF and
 World Bank and privately owned corporations as "bad"
 and the sovereign Mexican state as "good." A later
 portion of the economic program even calls for further
 economic integration of Latin America and the
 Caribbean and the creation of a common market therein,
 a sort of alternative FTAA. According to the APPO, the
 problem is not with the market, not with
 capitalism, not with the existence of bureaucratic
 institutions, but rather with US imperialism and the
 bad countries of the North that take advantage of the
 good countries in the South. It's the same tired
 charade of national liberation that has proven time
 and time again to be a miserable dead end.

 The third point of their program of struggle is "For a
 Popular Democracy," in which they proclaim that the
 "present antidemocratic State should be replaced with
 a new State with a democratic and popular character…"
 which in turn will be based on "…the will of the
 Mexican people to constitute and make effective a
 Democratic and Representative Federal Republic." This
 points asserts that the state is a neutral institution
 and that everything would be better for all of us if
 only the corrupt, lying politicians were replaced by
 honest, democratic politicians. Perhaps their critique
 of the state is so liberal because many
 representatives in the APPO would like to see
 themselves as the next ruling elite, but that remains
 to be seen. Thus their program of struggle is not
 proposing the revolutionary transformation of social
 life, but rather the democratization of the state and
 the continuance of capitalism, albeit with a
 friendlier face.

 Given the participation of many dubious groups and
 characters, as well as the "Resolutions of the First
 State Assembly of the Peoples of Oaxaca," we must
 conclude that the character of the APPO is reformist,
 and their overall plan is one of recuperating the rage
 and resentment of the dispossessed in order to manage
 the misery of the current social order. The APPO does
 not seek to destroy the state, but it intends to
 democratize it. The APPO does not seek to end
 capitalism, but it intends to increase state ownership
 of corporations and make capitalism fairer. Plainly
 stated, the APPO – an organization with defined
 principles and a long term strategy of struggle— does
 not share common goals with anarchists, and is
 certainly taking part in activity that will actively
 undermine the overthrow of this system. They promote
 false alternatives and question only the management of
 the state and capitalism, not the system itself.

 Solidarity?

 "Prepare to die…Put down your shields and take off
 your helmets, and I'll beat the living shit out of
 you!" –anonymous Oaxacan woman a defending the UABJO

 This brings us full circle then to the issue of
 solidarity. Clearly the APPO is an organization with
 wide support from those who want to see major change
 come about in their lives; this cannot be denied. But
 their popularity does not erase the fact that there
 are micro-bureaucrats actively involved in the APPO,
 nor does it change the fact that the APPO's program is
 one of promoting a new way to manage the state and
 capitalism. Also despite its name, the APPO does not
 represent everyone involved, or the revolt in its
 entirety. The uprising in Oaxaca has been inspiring
 because of people's willingness to take their lives
 into their own hands and direct their own activity.
 This is the greatest potential of the rebellion: its
 ability to break with the normality of being
 controlled and directed by others and then spread
 further, eventually leading to revolutionary social
 transformation.

 People are beginning to rediscover the ability to meet
 face-to-face in occupied zones – the Zócalo, the
 university, the neighborhoods and streets— in order to
 discuss matters of real importance. Direct actions
 such as strikes, occupations, blockades and sabotage
 are being employed by all of those involved. Women are
 asserting themselves even more, planning actions,
 taking over television stations, organizing blockades,
 and participating in street fighting against the
 police. The cessation of "business as usual" and the
 casting off of subservience has opened up many
 possibilities and has led to massive resistance to the
 Mexican state. This growing self-organization must
 remain truly autonomous if it is not to be slowly
 ground down by piecemeal reforms and other political
 tricks. Therefore the APPO and its alternative
 management plan must be rejected.

 Despite the deficiencies of the APPO, we should extend
 solidarity to the people fighting in Oaxaca. In the
 United States many solidarity actions were undertaken
 during the PFP raids in late October and early
 November. Protests were held outside of embassies and
 consulates in many cities across the US, including
 Houston, Phoenix, and Seattle. Consulates in
 Sacramento and Minneapolis had their windows smashed,
 and other consulates and embassies were blockaded or
 occupied like in New York, Indianapolis, and Raleigh.
 Anarchists in the US have been very active in
 concretely demonstrating their solidarity with the
 events in Oaxaca, and one can only hope that these
 actions will spread.

 The course of the conflict is being played out as we
 write. The Zapatistas have called for a general strike
 in Mexico on November 20, and scores of actions are
 planned in the US and abroad for that day as well.
 Consulates and embassies are clearly targets of
 interest, but one should not forget that we are
 fighting an entire system, and that demonstrating
 solidarity with Oaxaca can take many forms such as
 shut downs of corporations with financial links in
 Mexico as a whole, blockades in our own cities, and of
 course the escalation of activity against more direct
 issues in the US. People in Oaxaca are taking steps to
 combat this system as a whole, let's do the same.

 ------------ --------- -
 Notes:
 "Oaxaca Teachers Union Protests face Police
 Repression," available at: http://www.chiapasp
 eacehouse. org/node/ 286, and "Up From Below: The New
 Revolution in Southern Mexico," available at:
http://www.counterp unch.org/ ross07142006. html
 "In Oaxaca Mega-March, 400,000 Send A Firm No to the
 Repression by Governor Ulises Ruiz Ortíz," available
 at: http://www.narconew s.com/Issue41/ article1906.
 html
 "Oaxaca's State TV Station Under Popular Control,"
 available at: http://www.narconew s.com/Issue42/
 article1990. html
 "Mexico Teachers Extend Protest," available at:
http://news. bbc.co.uk/ 2/hi/americas/ 5272462..stm
 "Vioelence Flares in South Mexico," available at:
http://news. bbc.co.uk/ 2/hi/americas/ 4782837..stm
 For the APPO's denunciation of violence, see
http://codepappo. wordpress. com/2006/ 10/29/urgente-
 la-pfp-en- oaxaca
 "Under the Volcano," The Economist, September 28,
 2006.
 "Oaxaca's Dangerous Teachers," Dollars & Sense: the
 Magazine of Economic Justice, September/October 2006.
 "Police Retake Oaxaca Town Hall Occupied Since January
 2005," available at: http://www.narconew
 s.com/Issue40/ article1654. html
 "How Many Deaths Is the Oaxaca Governor Worth?"
 available at: http://www.commondr eams.org/
 headlines06/ 1103-08.htm
 "Oaxaca's Dangerous Teachers," Dollars & Sense: the
 Magazine of Economic Justice, September/October 2006.
 For more information about the economic background of
 Mexico, see "A Commune in Chiapas? Mexico and the
 Zapatista Rebellion," Aufheben #9, Autumn 2000.
 Frente Popular Revolucionario: http://fprweb.
 tripod.com/ index.htm, and Unión de la Juventud
 Revolucionaria de México: http://pagina. de/ujrm. For
 interview with Florentino Lopez Martinez see:
http://www.infoshop .org/inews/ article..php?
 story=2006102208 4418717.
 "Liderazgo "camaleónico" : Flavio Sosa, cabeza de la
 APPO, apoyó al PRD, luego a Fox," Diario de la
 Yucatán, Nov. 6 2006.
 "Oaxaca's Social Movement Develops Radical Vision for
 a National Government of the People" available at:
http://www.narconew s.com/Issue42/ article2038. html.
 Resolutions of the First State Assembly of the
 People's of Oaxaca are available online at:
http://www.asamblea populardeoaxaca. com/boletines/
 index.php? s=RESOLUTIVOS+ DE+LA+PRIMERA+ ASAMBLEA+
 ESTATAL+DE+ LOS+PUEBLOS+ DE+OAXACA+
 For a look at one neighborhood' s activities which are
 outside of the APPO, see "Two Days in the Life of
 Oaxaca's Revolution," available at: http://narconews.
 com/Issue42/ article2021. html





Shop with:

Subscriptions

Subscribe to Mute Magazine


Mute Magazine Subscription [Individual]
Start my subscription with issue






Institutional prices

User login

Mute Social


Email list discussion and annoucement

Subscribe to the list

Mute social is an open list for discusion around content and issues relating to metamute.org