| Sisters of Mute | Openmute - Linkme2 - More is More - independent media distribution | |||
|
|||
|
The 4th International Symposium on Emerging Techniques: SportArt
Editorial content |
Submitted by Josie on Wednesday, 27 September, 2006 - 11:26
Finally, the pundits of Creative Economies and all that malarkey will be forced to confront their own bastard child: SportArt. Despite the eagerness to strip mine 'creativity' and 'leisure' in an effort to stave off economic doom, the consensual hallucination of a Creative Economy on which it rests is turning more psychedelic than value-producing. While erstwhile 'industry leaders' like super-curator Hans Ulrich Obrist subject themselves to marathon public mea culpas (cf. his forthcoming 24hr talk on Art + Finance at the Serpentine) others, such as the SportArtists, are quietly turning the distinctions between sport and art into spaghetti shapes. As they so provocatively ask, who will sponsor this aberration? What does it mean for audience participation? What does it mean when the Arts Council starts sponsoring people to go to holiday resorts and roll pebbles? And will the media start asking 'but is it sport?' Calla d'Or, Majorca Inclusive registration fee (travel, accommodation, registration) is £250 'Whenever I hear the word 'culture', I reach for my chequebook' 'Every sport pretends to a literature' Call for papers and actions The International Symposium on Emerging Techniques is a restlessly discursive interdisciplinary forum for artists, academics and amateur enthusiasts. In previous years, the symposium has been called to consider topics as diverse as 'Domestic Science: genetic modification in the kitchen garden' and 'Spectres of the Spectrum: piracy, transmission, reception and static'. It has convened on a camel caravan leading into the Great Mosque of Djenné, on an abandoned oil rig in the North Sea and in the catacombs beneath Paris. This year the Symposium convenes on the cliffs and in the caves of south western Marjorca, Calla d'Or, to get to grips with the emerging techniques of SportArt. With an eye on the 2012 Olympic Games, this gathering will map out the parameters of an emerging discourse and practice that promises to be an increasingly intense focus of public and corporate cultural investment and media attention. SportArt intervenes in an institutional apparatus that conflates art, sport and tourism in the production of a novel managerial artefact: the 'cultural economy' (comprising of the 'creative' and 'leisure' industries). This is the final call for papers and actions addressing the emerging techniques of SportArt. We welcome submissions that speak to or perform to the following rubrics:
"There is culture, which is the rule...there is the exception, which is art. Every one speaks the rule." - Jean-Luc Godard
Founded in 1960, by a group of leading French writers and mathematicians, Oulipo, aimed to explore the potentials of literary production through the voluntary adoption of formal constraints. They noted that all artistic forms consisted of more or less arbitrary rules and constraints (rhyme schemes and metre in poetry, say), in any case. Sports, too, are defined by a conformity to recursive regimes devoid of utility - twenty-two humans on a rectangular plot of earth endeavour to sink a leather bladder in a net using only their feet, chests and heads. SportArt asks, faced with a rock and the laws of gravity, or, faced with a wall and the dictates of the town planner, what are the rules of the game?
The practices of sport and art share a number of family resemblances, the most significant of which are perhaps the centrality of 'performance' and 'spectatorship' to each. The possibilities of solitary practice, notwithstanding, we ask what are the dynamics of doing and looking, and what role do technologies of record play in SportArt?
Boxing, fencing, and hunting are key elements of a modernist tradition to which Hemmingway is central. What are the gender dynamics of the contemporary practice of SportArt and what are its connections with a modernist legacy?
The institutional economies of both contemporary art and sport are marked by a tension between, on the one hand, an ethos of amateur or vocational disinterest (art/sport for art/sport's sake), and, on the other hand, the imperatives of sensational commercial exploitation. What will be the material and economic conditions of SportArt? Will it have sponsors or patrons? Will it find public support or develop as the private pursuit of committed amateurs? How will it fit into the institutional matrix of the flourishing culture of 'Blairite Baroque'?
Given that many SportArtists have emerged from net.art practices predicated on the appropriation of a massive technological infrastructure, SportArt's ethic of 'nakedness' and renunciation of 'equipment' is perhaps somewhat ironic. To climb without shoes or chalk, to sleep beneath the stars and travel without burden into a vanishing distance. But what is 'nakedness' in an often toxic urban environment, and what are the potentials of mobile and textile technologies for a practice in an increasingly 'localised' nature?
Leni Riefenstahl and Adolf Hitler's Triumph of the Will is perhaps the greatest and most disturbing aesthetic achievement of fascist sporting spectacle. How might the emerging discourses of SportArt position themselves vis a vis the spectacular legacies of the fascist and social realist aestheticization of sport, on the one hand, and the sensational commercialisation of much contemporary British art, on the other?
Invited participants include: Made possible by: department for culture, media and sport: subject: Art | Conceptual | Fictitious Capital | Performance | Situationist | Surrealist | Tactical Media view pdf | 1422 reads
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mute publishing Ltd - legal information (under construction) | Site by OpenMute |